The Use Of TPR Method In Teaching Vocabulary At Yayasan Al Falah

Authors

  • Evha Nazalatus Sa'adiyah Sy unira
  • Chairunnisa SMPN 5 Pamekasan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31597/sl.v8i2.992

Keywords:

TPR, method, vocabulary

Abstract

This research is to investigate how to apply the TPR method and the students’ response toward the implementation of this method at 6th grade MI an Al Falah Islamic education foundation. The data collected by using observation, interview and questioner. The result of the research of conducting TPR method to VI grade of described with descriptive qualitative method, the researcher uses saturation sampling methods in analyzing data, where all of number of populations become sample, there are one English teacher and 17 students. Based on the result of observation, interview and questioner has been finding that there are students’ response are faced by the teacher in applying of TPR method such as: the students like and enjoy the material, the students dislike this method and the students feel bored of conducting this method, beside that the researcher found the total numbers of students like this method for about 11 students, it shown when the teacher give a command and demonstrate the movement they respond it well, and 4 students dislike this method and 2 students feel bored of this method, it shown when the students cannot demonstrate the command of the teacher and they are not active in learning process.

References

Ainin, Agustina. 2007. Penelitian qualitative: perkenalan awal. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
Brown, Douglas. H. 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching (fifth edition), New York: Pearson Education.
Creswell, W, John. 2005. Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches- 2nd ed. USA: Sage Publication, Inc.
Daniel Pratt, D. Good Teaching: One Size Fits All?. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education no. 93 (Spring 2002): 5-15. accessed on 9th February 2014
Elqorni.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/populasi-dan-sampel-population-and-sample: accessed on 8th June 2014)
Fischer, Barbara Bree and Louis Fischer (1979). Styles in Teaching and Learning. Educational Leadership 36 (January), 251. accessed on 6th January 2014
Grasha&Grasha (1996). Teaching with Style. Pittsburgh, PA: Alliance Publishers. accessed on 4th February 2014
Hadi, Sutrisno. 1987. Methodology research 2.Yogyakarta. Yayasan Pembina Fakultas Psikologi. Universitas Gajah Mada
Harmer, Jeremy. Harlow. 2008. How to teach English. U.K. Longman
Patricia, A. and Amato-Richard. 2003. Making it Happen (third edition), NewYork: Pearson education.
Richards, Jack C. and Rodgers Theodore S. 2001. Approach and Methods in Language Teaching (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rogova, g.v. 1975. Methods of teaching English. Poroba. R.b
Sardiman, Refnaldi. 2003. Pengantar, Mengajar kreatif siswa aktif. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Sukarno. 2008. Teaching english to young learners and factors To consider in designing the materials. Yogyakarta. Faculty of Languages and Arts Yogyakarta State University.
Sy, Evha Nazalatu Sa’adiyah. 2019. The Effect of Using Sequenced Pictures on Students’ Ability to Write Narrative. IJET State Islamic University of Sunan Ampel Surabaya Vol 8 No 2 Halaman 8-14
Thornbury, Scott. 2002. How to Teach Vocabulary. England: Longman
Yursa Cahyono, Bambang. 2000. Qualitative research methodology. Malang: State of university of Malang Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-15

How to Cite

Sy, E. N. S., & Chairunnisa. (2023). The Use Of TPR Method In Teaching Vocabulary At Yayasan Al Falah. SELL (Scope of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature) Journal, 8(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.31597/sl.v8i2.992